DISQUS

Terri · 4 years ago

Since Jack Nicholson's version of the Joker is/was so infamous, aren't they setting themselves up for comparison by doing villians tackled in the original movies?
'

Brian · 4 years ago

I agree. Redoing Two-Face is okay in my book because Batman Forever sucked, but redoing Joker doesn't make sense to me because of the success of the 1989 film.

Brian

Screen Rant · 4 years ago

I don't think it will be an issue (if they find the right actor). The style of this movie (and the sequels) will be completely different from the original, and I hate to say it but 1989 was a long time ago in movie-time. :shock:

Vic

Brian · 4 years ago

Point taken, but you were (correctly) talking about how the fanboys would be receiving these new films. What do you think the odds are that they won't be making such comparisons?

Brian

Screen Rant · 4 years ago

I think that anyone who is a fan will be so incredibly relieved to see this movie after the travesty that was the last couple of films that it won't bother them a bit.

Sure, Nicholson was great, but he was almost more Nicholson than Joker. It's not like it was the performance to end all performances.

Vic

Brian · 4 years ago

Oh, now I KNOW you didn't just diss my boy Jack. :lol:

Screen Rant · 4 years ago

Nicholson is awesome, but he doesn't exactly disappear into a role, does he? :P

Vic

Brian · 4 years ago

No, not the way Billy Crudup or Johnny Depp can. I think the closest he has come to "disappearing into a role" was About Schmidt.

Brian

michael clement · 4 years ago

I was thinking that for the next batman begins movie how about for the villains it could be two face and catwoman.

Eduard · 4 years ago

I think there should be a new version of the joker. Nicholson was excellent in my opinion but it's been over ten years, we need a younger joker, a new joker with a whole lot of psicology involved in him.
One that doesn't die in the end, but rather gets locked on Arkham. And that makes The Batman question himself.
It'd be great to see him reborn. There will be comparisons, but I don't think that should be an issue. After all, it's a new gotham. It's Batman from scratch and that is alright.

Z · 4 years ago

They should have the Scarecrow in the begining so we know what happened to him like the first five or ten minutes. Did batman caught him or not? But as for Batman6 I think it should be Robin Williams as the Joker and a villian(or two)that has not made a movie apperance. The ones that are left are still good are Clayface, the Ventriloquist and Scarface, Black Mask, Man-Bat, Killer Croc, Hush, Lady Shiva, Mad Hatter, Harley Quinn, and Talia. :twisted:

Bryan · 4 years ago

I have heard that they are looking younger for the role of The Joker and considering the relatively unknown Russell Sams for the role. Russell was seen in the hit "Rules of Attraction." Judging from his performance in "Rules.." I think he would make a great Joker. :wink:

Dale · 4 years ago

These are the names I've heard have been considered for the Joker: Lachy Hulme, Crispin Glover, Paul Bettany, Tim Roth, and Sean Penn.

Bdub · 4 years ago

I agree Bryan....I give my vote to Rizzle to the Izzle...Russell Sams all the way.

JIM · 4 years ago

They should cast a complete unknown as the Joker. It will give the sequel even more realism than its excellent predessor.

Anonymous · 4 years ago

joker i heard will be played by mark hamil he didthe voice in the 90's cartoon

bob · 4 years ago

and skywalkerin 70's right

jim · 4 years ago

Hamill played Luke Skywalker correct, Joker in the cartoon I'm not sure.

Screen Rant · 4 years ago

Yes, Hamill did the voice of Joker in the 90's cartoon.