<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Screen Rant testing - Latest Comments in More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://devscreenrant.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://devscreenrant.disqus.com/more_remake_bad_news/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21651908</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A Dallas remake?!  Good grief... say it ain't so.   :o&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 00:10:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609729</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I read about that one as well. I neglected to mention it above, but I suppose I should have.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609728</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A Dallas remake?!  Good grief... say it ain't so.   :o&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:48:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You said it Vic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;To my utter dismay I saw on &lt;a href="http://cnn.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="cnn.com"&gt;cnn.com&lt;/a&gt; today that there is a "Dallas" movie in the works (don't know if you've commented on it before and I just missed it), with John Travolta in the running as J.R. and JLo being offered the part of Sue Ellen.  I remember my mother used to watch the show.  Is this REALLY something that needs a movie/remake...and what the heck is Travolta thinking? :shock:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dale&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Anonymous</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:16:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The original Ocean's 11 wasn't very good; Soderbergh did a better job with it in the remake.  That's the point Vic was trying to make -- if you have to do a remake, why remake something that was awesome the first time around?  You're absolutely right about Hollywood being afraid to take risks, though.  That's why remakes have been around for so long, and will be for the foreseeable future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:16:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well that is true, but it doesn't mean it can't work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However I think what the problem is really is lack of investment and time in original ideas and allowing talent to pursue those original ideas.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Hollywood has no balls anymore, they are playing the safe option for consistent revenue, not pushing the storytelling to get great films and find big returns. That's too risky.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Brunton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:34:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609724</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Dude, anything is possible of course, but I think that part of the problem with a lot of movies today is that "style and bags of cash" have replaced great stories and casting. 8)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Vic&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Vic</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:26:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Remake Bad News</title><link>http://dev2.screenrant.com/more-remake-bad-news-vic-460/#comment-21609723</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Vic, I was musing about this and wondered if it might just work. If they threw the Oceans treatment at it. Huge, big star cast (as the original) and modernised it with style and bags of cash...you know, it might just work.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Imagine the story updated like Three Kings with the cast of Oceans Eleven? Surely that's huge entertainment potential?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Richard Brunton</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>